On Divorce

February 21st, 2012 | Posted by Lunar in Familial Reflections | Relationships | Vedas - (0 Comments)

Today’s date is quite interesting 21-02, 2012 but that’s merely a derailing off topic.

My parents have been separated, then divorced for two years now. And although I did not have to go through my own stages of grief to deal with it (mostly because there was no grief; I felt like it was long overdue and the day that my dad had moved out I thought was a bright beginning towards family happiness), I am still trying to get my mom to see it the same way that I do.

I keep trying to excavate the core issue here so I could “learn from the mistakes of others” but too many things emerge out of the water for me to say that he was impossible to deal with but she could’ve used her woman’s power to change things around. But the question is: should she have?

My mother was always a very grounded and practical person. My dad liked to take calculated risks, albeit maybe not as calculated as my mom would have liked them to be. She chose to accept that everybody lived average family lives and that forever and ever happiness only existed in story books. She was great at handling the worst when she knew that it was the only way out. Even when she was worried, she had a look of determination on her face. That’s why I can’t figure out why she doesn’t see this as just another challenge on her path she needs to get through. Maybe this was how she was before because other people, her family, depended on her keeping her cool and now it’s only her for whom this challenge really matters. And she’s crumbling.

There is a huge list of reasons why I never got along with my dad. Maybe we are too alike to keep seeing our own minuses mirrored at us in each other. But regardless, his actions following through the divorce were not honourable and so, unfortunately I got a little biased along the way.

The thing that my dad had never realized is that in a relationship of a woman and a man, moreover – a marriage, the woman manifests. She creates forms, “castles in the air”, that the man then substantiates using his God given physical power. If she is convinced that his goals do not meet the best interest of the entire family, she will paint a different picture, which will bystep his original plans. He could huff and puff but they will both be at a standstill because the man is not putting in the effort into this newly created picture and the woman refuses to manifest the man’s picture because she doesn’t have faith in it. A woman’s faith is like steam powering a train. You could try pushing a train on your own but it will be the steam giving it full force of speed. And without a train, a steam is just useless vapor. And unfortunately my dad never seemed to realize that. He definitely knew that her lack of faith in his investment plans was the stopper too difficult for him to remove and for that, he got angry at her.

So in his mind – she wasn’t fulfilling one of her wifely duties: supporting the husband. But he also never realized that one of his husband duties was performed substandard: the duty to protect. It is a husband’s job to make his wife feel that she is fully protected from everything, safe in his little bubble. She has to feel safe from any possible outside threats (not just bullies on the street, although that’s part of the list too) including financial ones. How is she supposed to feel safe if her entire marriage she only heard, “We are on a budget” “We can’t afford that” or “We have other priorities”? I remember the days when my dad would bring home some expensive piece of technology, like the blu-ray player right when they first came out or a new laptop or else, and my mom would just be stupified in shock. He wanted to spoil himself once in a while but how is she to feel if not only was she not consulted on the purchase but every other 364 days of the year, she gets told that there’s a budget to abide to? She couldn’t even accept gifts because she felt that the money that was spent on her could have been spent somewhat more usefully to buy something for her children; she was that selfless and still is. But why? Because for 25 years the fear-based belief had rooted itself deep into her subconscious that money is tight and we need to survive. Same as it is the husband’s job to be the primary breadwinner according to the Vedas, same it is to provide comforts to his family, especially the woman who birthed two of his children and left entirely everything to move to a country she didn’t want to go to.

If he had known those two factors, maybe she would feel safer about him taking the risks that he did. Maybe he would have gotten the support he wanted because she would believe in him more…

Open Marriages

January 27th, 2012 | Posted by Lunar in Relationships | Theories & Philosophy - (0 Comments)

On the way to work this morning, I listened to the radio, the beat 94.5. The show hosts were discussing the Globe and Mail’s article on open marriages, which can be found here: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/relationships/love/marriage/open-marriage-who-does-it-how-it-works-and-why-it-doesnt/article2316430/?utm_medium=Feeds%3A%20RSS%2FAtom&utm_source=Life&utm_content=2316430

The radio talk show hosts were talking about different aspects of an arrangement like that, albeit barely grazing the surface rather than digging into the meat of it to accomodate the shallow minds of the average population. The male host said that it is usually the people who would like to have it are the ones who are being so negative and “hating” about it. Ok, I’m nowhere near jealous of such an arrangement and I’m not a “hater” towards the people who find it so convenient but my question is how does it really work? In monogamy, everything seems to be intuitively set up. If you are loyal, faithful, loving & caring and your lines of communication are rather decent, you can expect to receive the same in return in the form of love, care, effort, support, etc. If your husband is out and about with his flavour of the week and you just found out that you’ve been laid off (and at this time, you are out of boyfriends to comfort you), is the husband expected to leave his girlfriend to go and comfort you? Where do you draw your priorities between people? Can you really be “committed” to one person legally and another person by mutual agreement?

“For some, one-night stands on business trips are okay but deeper emotional attachments are not. For others, there is plenty of room for long-term girlfriends and boyfriends outside the marriage. … “People get attracted to other people,” says the 30-something. “It’s normal, it’s natural and we both felt it was silly to lie about it. And maybe more fun and interesting and healthy to, when it comes up, not repress but explore it. And share the adventure.”

Although he is now separated from his wife – after a period of closing the marriage and focusing on each other – he believes it was one of their strengths and did not weaken their marriage.

“I still regard it as, for super-high-level, awesome marriages, why not? You’re so committed to each other, who cares whether you occasionally have an affair?””

A few other questions I’m baffled by: if one of your ground rules with your partner is that you cannot develop a deeper emotional attachment to the other party, how do you protect yourself from doing so? And what happens if you do everything that is in your power to avoid it but it happens anyway? Does this honesty expand to discussing the sexual details of the other relationship? Can there really be no jealousy if you’re trying to do something creatively experimental in the bedroom for him and he goes, “Julie tilts her hip to the left; it works better that way”?

I don’t know. Maybe I’m too old-world for this kind of thinking. I had a hard time enough as it is dealing with my jealous side in response to the “ex” topic and the only way I could try to by-pass the emotional freak-out is by repeating that it was all in the past and they can’t affect him now the way that I can. See, in an open marriage you can’t say that. Because who knows who is going to cross his path today – maybe she will have some VD that he will bring back to you? Or maybe the short-lived passion will be so long that it will snap his weakening sense of “commitment” into two and he’ll leave you with the three kids to go chase the object his loins are burning for. I don’t know. Maybe someone can help me understand.

True Love

January 21st, 2012 | Posted by Lunar in Relationships - (0 Comments)

It seems to be a big question these days: how can you tell that they love you? And depending on what kind of expression of love you were raised to appreciate (i.e. love through words, love through actions, etc.), one will be looking for that expression in the other person. One of the cutest quotes I heard was from movie Curly Sue where Sue tells Grey, “I know how you can tell [if he loves you]. If he lets you eat first.” It was cute because for this girl, she was raised on the street where the food was rare to come around by and so for her, if the other person let you eat first, it meant the highest expression of love and admiration.

I am very blessed to say that not only did I never have to experience hunger in my life but my husband keeps a firm eye on me to eat nutritious high-quality food, which he ensures that there is an abundance of at all times in both our homes. But there are times that he makes me feel even more loved if it were possible. I woke up last Saturday morning from a dream that I had some kind of lemon curd danish. I woke up before Anton did, which is a rare occurrence. And with the though of the lemon curd danish, I woke him up with morning snuggles, telling him all about my lemon curd danish dream. He got dressed and went to the Macrina bakery to see if they have any such things in store, or so I thought. He came back with a lemon curd muffin and a chocolate croissant from another coffee shop as back-up in case I didn’t like the muffin! It was the sweetest thing and I savored in that muffin as long as I could :) I’m a sucker for romance, what can I say…

Switch to our mobile site